In response to our objection, the Head of Planning questioned to what extent Avon Wildlife Trust had looked in detail at the proposal. Specifically, because we had mentioned further threats to the site in addition to the crematorium expansion.

When looking at threats to habitats, you have to consider it holistically and assess the cumulative impact from developments on all areas of the site. We are shocked to see these cumulative impacts, and our concerns, dismissed when considering developments to SNCIs. We know the site very well having visited over many years and know the long-standing value that this site offers to wildlife with its meadows, scrub and ancient hedgerows.

Avon Wildlife Trust stands to protect wildlife and the habitats it depends on. Considering planning proposals on a case by case basis doesn’t work for protecting ecosystems. It is imperative that decision-makers understand the cumulative impact of planning decisions. To successfully deliver Bristol’s Ecological Emergency Action Plan, our authorities have a duty to look strategically at their policies and operations to assess what action they can take to further the conservation and enhancement of biodiversity, including regard to the relevant Local Nature Recovery Strategies.

We share the concern expressed by Planning Committee Chair that last night’s decision is part of a wider picture of encroachment on designated Sites of Nature Conservation Interest across the region. If we cannot protect this SNCI then what is stopping development on others across the city? It is a slippery slope and with wildlife in rapid free fall, there isn’t much slope left.